<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Obscure Box</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.obscurebox.com/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.obscurebox.com</link>
	<description>Thoughts from inside the obscure box</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 14 Mar 2012 09:35:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Call that a heat ray?</title>
		<link>http://www.obscurebox.com/2012/03/14/call-that-a-heat-ray/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=call-that-a-heat-ray</link>
		<comments>http://www.obscurebox.com/2012/03/14/call-that-a-heat-ray/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Mar 2012 09:35:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael Lund</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Observation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Print]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.obscurebox.com/?p=715</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[IT takes an Australian media report to make the US military's new heat ray a lot more powerful than intended. ninemsn's report Military 'heat ray' to disperse rioting crowds (Wednesday 14 March 2012) says the heat ray has the power to disperse riotous crowds. It does so by "instantly heating their skin to a temperature [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.obscurebox.com/2012/03/14/call-that-a-heat-ray/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How much oil was spilled in the Brisbane River?</title>
		<link>http://www.obscurebox.com/2012/01/25/how-much-oil-was-spilled-in-the-brisbane-river/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=how-much-oil-was-spilled-in-the-brisbane-river</link>
		<comments>http://www.obscurebox.com/2012/01/25/how-much-oil-was-spilled-in-the-brisbane-river/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2012 09:30:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael Lund</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Observation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Radio]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.obscurebox.com/?p=709</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If you were listening to the ABC's PM program last night then its report would have made you think it was an even more catastrophic event than it was in the first place. See this line from reporter Imogen Brennan in "Environmental concerns after oil spill in Brisbane River" (Tuesday 24 January 2012). How much? [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.obscurebox.com/2012/01/25/how-much-oil-was-spilled-in-the-brisbane-river/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A severe outbreak of speculection hits Queensland</title>
		<link>http://www.obscurebox.com/2012/01/23/a-severe-outbreak-of-speculection-hits-queensland/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=a-severe-outbreak-of-speculection-hits-queensland</link>
		<comments>http://www.obscurebox.com/2012/01/23/a-severe-outbreak-of-speculection-hits-queensland/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2012 07:30:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael Lund</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Observation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Print]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.obscurebox.com/?p=706</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Speculection is my word for the endless speculation on the date of the next election in any parliamentary system that doesn’t operate under a fixed term system, such as Queensland. Journalists and commentators are busy predicting the date they believe the Premier Anna Bligh will haul the good folk of Queensland back to the polling [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.obscurebox.com/2012/01/23/a-severe-outbreak-of-speculection-hits-queensland/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Things for 2012 to do</title>
		<link>http://www.obscurebox.com/2012/01/01/things-for-2012-to-do/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=things-for-2012-to-do</link>
		<comments>http://www.obscurebox.com/2012/01/01/things-for-2012-to-do/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Jan 2012 03:10:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael Lund</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Consumer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Observation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Print]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Radio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.obscurebox.com/?p=699</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It's fair to say that 2011 was one of those years I'm glad is finally over and hello 2012. If it wasn't one thing it was another that challenged all in 2011, from its damp, soggy and destructive start that seemed to have an impact on almost everything that followed. But isn't it a case [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.obscurebox.com/2012/01/01/things-for-2012-to-do/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A reply from the ABC over my Skype concerns</title>
		<link>http://www.obscurebox.com/2011/05/30/a-reply-from-the-abc-over-my-skype-concerns/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=a-reply-from-the-abc-over-my-skype-concerns</link>
		<comments>http://www.obscurebox.com/2011/05/30/a-reply-from-the-abc-over-my-skype-concerns/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 May 2011 05:30:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael Lund</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Consumer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.obscurebox.com/?p=685</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I have finally received an e-mail from the ABC over the Skype concerns I raised in "The ABC’s love affair with Skype" (Wednesday 20 April 2011),. The e-mail tells me the Audience and Consumer Affairs unit has investigated the matter I raised and has found nothing wrong with Skype mentions by the broadcaster. When assessed [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.obscurebox.com/2011/05/30/a-reply-from-the-abc-over-my-skype-concerns/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

