<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Obscure Box &#187; Radio</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.obscurebox.com/category/media/radio/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.obscurebox.com</link>
	<description>Thoughts from inside the obscure box</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2012 09:32:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>How much oil was spilled in the Brisbane River?</title>
		<link>http://www.obscurebox.com/2012/01/25/how-much-oil-was-spilled-in-the-brisbane-river/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=how-much-oil-was-spilled-in-the-brisbane-river</link>
		<comments>http://www.obscurebox.com/2012/01/25/how-much-oil-was-spilled-in-the-brisbane-river/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2012 09:30:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael Lund</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Observation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Radio]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.obscurebox.com/?p=709</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If you were listening to the ABC's PM program last night then its report would have made you think it was an even more catastrophic event than it was in the first place. See this line from reporter Imogen Brennan in "Environmental concerns after oil spill in Brisbane River" (Tuesday 24 January 2012). How much? [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.obscurebox.com/2012/01/25/how-much-oil-was-spilled-in-the-brisbane-river/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Things for 2012 to do</title>
		<link>http://www.obscurebox.com/2012/01/01/things-for-2012-to-do/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=things-for-2012-to-do</link>
		<comments>http://www.obscurebox.com/2012/01/01/things-for-2012-to-do/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Jan 2012 03:10:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael Lund</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Consumer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Observation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Print]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Radio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.obscurebox.com/?p=699</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It's fair to say that 2011 was one of those years I'm glad is finally over and hello 2012. If it wasn't one thing it was another that challenged all in 2011, from its damp, soggy and destructive start that seemed to have an impact on almost everything that followed. But isn't it a case [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.obscurebox.com/2012/01/01/things-for-2012-to-do/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>It takes a media release to tell me that the media release isn&#8217;t dead</title>
		<link>http://www.obscurebox.com/2011/05/17/it-takes-a-media-release-to-tell-me-that-the-media-release-isnt-dead/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=it-takes-a-media-release-to-tell-me-that-the-media-release-isnt-dead</link>
		<comments>http://www.obscurebox.com/2011/05/17/it-takes-a-media-release-to-tell-me-that-the-media-release-isnt-dead/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 May 2011 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael Lund</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Consumer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Print]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Radio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Style]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.obscurebox.com/?p=679</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I found this out in a media release from Brisbane firm BWH Communication, called ''Is the media release dead in a new age of social media?'' (Friday 29 April 2011). It offers an interesting insight in to the way the PR industry views the media. So why does BWH believe the media release isn't dead? [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.obscurebox.com/2011/05/17/it-takes-a-media-release-to-tell-me-that-the-media-release-isnt-dead/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why Microsoft&#8217;s deal adds to the Skype/ABC concern</title>
		<link>http://www.obscurebox.com/2011/05/11/why-microsofts-deals-adds-to-the-skypeabc-concern/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=why-microsofts-deals-adds-to-the-skypeabc-concern</link>
		<comments>http://www.obscurebox.com/2011/05/11/why-microsofts-deals-adds-to-the-skypeabc-concern/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 May 2011 22:34:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael Lund</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Consumer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Radio]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.obscurebox.com/?p=676</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So the software giant Microsoft has bought the on-line communications firm Skype. That's according to a report I've just read on the ABC's website, "Microsoft buys Skype for $7.9b" (Wednesday 11 May 2011). This only adds to my concern over the ABC's reporters and presenters telling me when they do an interview using Skype (See [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.obscurebox.com/2011/05/11/why-microsofts-deals-adds-to-the-skypeabc-concern/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The ABC&#8217;s love affair with Skype</title>
		<link>http://www.obscurebox.com/2011/04/20/the-abcs-love-affair-with-skype/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=the-abcs-love-affair-with-skype</link>
		<comments>http://www.obscurebox.com/2011/04/20/the-abcs-love-affair-with-skype/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Apr 2011 06:58:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael Lund</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Observation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Radio]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.obscurebox.com/?p=667</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What is it about the ABC and Skype? There seems to be more than the odd mention of the online video/audio communication technology Skype on the ABC's airwaves these days. I'm not talking about the legitimate references to the free broadcast website used in the recent defence force sex scandal. I'm talking more about some [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.obscurebox.com/2011/04/20/the-abcs-love-affair-with-skype/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

